Arizona Tax Attorneys and EAs


IRS Audit Process
Here are some very real events you will encounter in an IRS Tax Audit
What do you do with your IRS Debt?
Here are your options

Arizona Tax Attorneys and EAs

What Can I do about My Tax Debt?

by BH Metcalfe EA on 02/09/15

I had a client come in recently that had given everything to her CPA and the CPA did everything wrong. Years later the IRS audited this client and found that she owed over $10k. With penalty and interest it had grown to over $20K. She called to ask what can be done. She had been hiding from the IRS for the past ten years. 

I set her up on a hardship to keep the IRS from collecting her taxes. This hardship is good for two years as long as she keeps filing her tax returns on time. 

Once she got a job we did an Offer in Compromise and settled on the amount for under $500. 

Today is the day to stop hiding and fix your tax problems. 

Did You know you can get an IRS Levy lifted?

by BH Metcalfe EA on 02/06/15

If you owe back taxes and are in collections with the IRS they may place a levy on your paycheck or your bank account. If it is a first time levy, most of the time the IRS will do a one time levy release.

Now of course the IRS will not let you know and will not tell you. That is why it is important to get help from a qualified professional. Don't play their games. Don't Play Games with the IRS

Resolute Tax Settles North Scottsdale Family Tax debt

by BH Metcalfe EA on 02/03/15

Rebert and Liza of North Scottsdale, Az. came to Resolute Tax Services after they had an accountant filed their tax returns for six years with bogus claims. They were told because they had rental properties these claims were valid. They weren't. After the IRS Audited them they owed over $75k in back taxes. 

Facing this debt Rebert and Liza did not know what to do. They came to Resolute Tax Services and contracted to do an Offer in Compromise. After eight months of negotiating with the IRS the Tax Professionals at Resolute Tax Services were able to settle with the IRS for $2100. 


by BH Metcalfe EA on 01/30/15

About thirteen months ago Jon from Glendale, Az came in because of a tax debt. The debt had accrued due to the fact that he owned his own business and hadn't filed taxes in eight year. We came in and filed the eight years and when we did with penalty and interest the tax debt came to be over $60K. Jon was in a position where he qualified for an Offer in Compromise. We did the Offer and submitted it to the IRS. We heard back a couple months later and after negotiations the IRS agreed to an Offer amount of $950. Jon is happy to say the least. If you owe the IRS money and can not afford to pay them please cal  to talk to one of our Enrolled Agents or Arizona Tax Attorneys. 

Resolute Tax Settles Chandlers 200K in Tax Debt for $1200 1/14/2015

by BH Metcalfe EA on 01/28/15

Resolute Tax Services and their IRS Tax Attorneys settled a $200,000 tax debt for $1,200. The Taxpayer was from Chandler, Az. He had accrued this debt over a ten period. He was a real estate agent for the ten years. The Taxpayer had missed his first year filing taxes because he knew he was going to owe taxes. Because of this it snowballed to be a ten years straight of not filing his tax returns. 

We were able to file the ten years of tax returns and then prepare and submit the offer in compromise. Our Tax Attorneys  were able to negotiate a settlement for the $1200 to wipe out all of this debt. 

For more information on OIC's click here. 


by BH Metcalfe EA on 11/17/14

One of the most common write-off for business owners is mileage on the miles they drive for business. One of the items that get dissallowed most and easiest is mileage. How to fight this and win is to keep good records. You don't need to keep reciepts of everytime that you have filled up. But what does help is to keep reciepts for oil changes. Along with oil change recipts keep a milage log of all business related miles. There are apps that do that these days. If you have both and they correspond with the mileage you are claiming on your return you should be fine in your tax audit when asked to substantiate the expense that was claimed.

Welcome to the Blog of the Premier Arizona Tax Firm

by BH Metcalfe EA on 11/07/14

I would like to welcome you to our Tax Tips that will be updated periodically. Hopefully you can find these tips helpful. They will be tips on IRS Audits and other Tax Filing tips. Hopefully we can help you with your Tax return filing if you are a DIY'er and just need some guidance. Also we do offer IRS representation for all kinds of tax problems but here we want to give you help. Feel free to email me with questions anytime.

IRS Audit Process

by BH Metcalfe EA on 03/16/11

IRS Tax Audit
It is important to know the IRS process and the inner workings during an IRS audit if you are ever to be audited. I think the reason why is from my experience I have seen that majority of Tax audits do not come out to a favorable outcome to the Taxpayer unless the Taxpayer has the Knowledge and Law on their Team.
How the IRS Chooses.
                Before you receive the dreaded letter from the IRS explaining that your tax returns have been selected for Audit, it is good to know how the IRS makes this Decision. Basically there are two ways that the IRS chooses a return for audit. The first and probably the most common are through an algorithm used by the IRS computers that chose Audits based on a score. The second is the human way of detective work by the IRS and other informants.
                The IRS has a computer program named the Discriminate Function System. The computer program uses an algorithm that takes several factors and creates a score. This score is called the Discriminate Funtion(DIF) score. The higher the score the more likely your return is to be Audited. Some of the factors are not limited to the following but can consist of, home office expense on schedule C, self employed, more than twelve thousand dollars in Charity Contribution. These are just some of the reasons.
                One of the other reasons that could produce a higher score would be differences in Income reported by third party Institutions and the information you provide.
                The Second reason for an audit would be through Detective tactics. The IRS has a reporting system that you can report someone of tax fraud. This could cause an examination of a return. Also the IRS could be looking into people or companies for unusual things occurring.  The IRS will go after cash reporting companies. The IRS will audit a Partner of a business which could cause an audit of the other partner.
Types of Audits
            IRS civil examinations can take a variety of forms, depending upon the type of taxpayer, the complexity of the tax return and the initially determined scope of the exam. The simplest examinations conducted by the IRS are Campus Examinations. Campus Examinations are correspondence exams addressing simple problems like substantiation that can be resolved easily by correspondence and/or telephone. Area Office Examinations may be conducted for slightly more complicated issues such as small business returns and more complex non-business returns. Area Office Examinations may be conducted by correspondence, office interview or even by a field examination, depending on type and complexity of the return. In all cases, the taxpayer is asked to provide supporting documentation of questionable items. Business returns will always be examined in an office or field interview rather than a correspondence examination.
As a practical matter, examiners at the correspondence and office levels are much less invasive. The examining agents are required to process many cases and often have little time to completely familiarize themselves with the return. Indeed, the examiner may not have reviewed the taxpayer’s file and return until after the taxpayer has replied to all correspondence regarding the examination, and often not until the day of the interview. The scope of office examinations is generally limited to items on a checklist of issues contained in the Internal Revenue Manual. The examiners have little discretion and basically, are charged with verifying income and deductions based upon records provided. A taxpayer’s inability to produce adequate records may lead not only to disallowance of the disputed items for the year at issue, but also to audits of other years’ returns.
Field Examinations involve more complex issues. The examining agent will be a revenue agent, as opposed to an office auditor. He or she will be better trained and will have had more experience. A Field Examination consists of examination of a taxpayer’s books and records at the taxpayer’s place of business or where the books, records or source documents are maintained. The agent will review the taxpayer’s entire return and all documentation related to that return. The agent may be assisted by a technical specialist such as an “engineer agent” if the return presents a special issue such as valuation. Unlike, office auditors, revenue agents spend considerable time preparing for the examination. Prior to the examination, the revenue agent will review any prior examination reports from the same taxpayer. This may lead to scrutiny of recurring issues or inclusion of other years’ returns in the examination. Of course, the revenue agent will also look at the return for unusual or questionable items.
Taxpayers Right During an Audit
                Taxpayers are guaranteed certain important rights during audits and examinations. Among these rights is the right to be provided certain information describing the examination process and other rights at the commencement of the examination. Examinations must be conducted at a reasonable time and place and taxpayers have the right to bring representation to any interview. Taxpayers have the right to record any interviews with the agent. Taxpayers also have the right not to be interviewed, except through the summons process, and must be notified of any summons to a third party and of their right to quash any such summons. Importantly, taxpayers have the right to have their tax information kept confidential.
Burden of Proof
                Under prior law, there was a rebuttable presumption that IRS’s determination of tax liability is correct, and therefore (with some exceptions such as fraud), the burden of proof was on the taxpayer to show that the IRS’s determination was wrong. Under new law, the IRS has the burden of proof in any court proceeding with respect to a factual issue related to income, estate, gift, and generation-skipping transfer taxes if the taxpayer introduces credible evidence relevant to the determination of the taxpayer’s tax liability. To be eligible, the taxpayer must prove that he or she complied with required statutory and regulatory substantiation and recordkeeping requirements; cooperated with reasonable IRS requests for meetings, interviews, witnesses, documents, and information; and (if not an individual) met certain net worth limitations. Cooperation generally involves: providing reasonable assistance to the IRS in accessing witnesses, information, and documents not within the taxpayer’s control; exhausting administrative remedies, including IRS appeal rights; and establishing the applicability of a privilege. Cooperation does not require that the taxpayer agree to an extension of the limitations period. The IRS continues to have the burden of proving fraud, irrespective of the new law.
Interacting with the IRS Agent
When possible, the taxpayer’s representative, not the taxpayer, should interact with the agent. Indeed, in most cases, the meetings should take place at the representative’s office, not the taxpayer’s place of business. Direct contact between the agent and the taxpayer (or taxpayer’s employees) should be minimized. Agents are trained in interviewing techniques designed to elicit information. They will ask open ended questions, and will listen carefully to the responses. Taxpayers who meet with an agent should be careful to answer only the question asked.
Absent having been served an administrative summons, a taxpayer has the right to refuse to be interviewed. Although, historically examining agents have been reluctant to press for taxpayer interviews, examining agents have become more aggressive in seeking taxpayer interviews and using summonses to compel them. If interviewed pursuant to a summons or otherwise, the taxpayer has a right to counsel and may assert appropriate privileges.
Care should be taken to create a complete record of all information provided to the examining agent. Maintain a detailed record of all documents and records provided to the examining agent. Maintain a record of any oral communication with the agent whether in person or by telephone. Confirm any material oral agreements in writing.
How Agents Gather Information
During the examination, the agent may request various types of documentation to verify items of income and expense on the return, including records, such as receipts, invoices, books, and worksheets. Revenue agents may also review prior or subsequent tax returns or the returns of related taxpayers.
Generally, agents have broad powers to compel production of relevant information. Nevertheless, certain types of information may be subject to privilege or otherwise not subject to compelled production. Once provided, the privilege is likely to have been waived. For example, an agent may ask to see invoices to substantiate a deduction claimed for professional services, such as accounting or legal fees. The descriptions of the services provided could contain information leading to another adjustment. If the descriptions of the services may be privileged, the taxpayer may be able to withhold the actual invoices in favor of some other proof of payment, or may be able to provide redacted invoices.
There has been much discussion about whether tax work papers can be so compelled. Tax work papers prepared in connection with the preparation of the tax return can be reviewed. However, audit accrual work papers, which may reflect opinions and estimates related to questionable items on the return, present a more complex question. Agents are cautioned in the Internal Revenue Manual to exercise restraint in this area, but the Service is becoming more aggressive, particularly where listed transactions are involved.
Keep in mind that the taxpayer’s books and records may contain confidential information of another taxpayer, such as IP or the terms of a contract. The taxpayer may be under a contractual obligation to keep this information confidential. If the agent can not be convinced to accept redacted documents, the taxpayer may want to decline to produce the document unless an administrative summons is issued compelling its disclosure.

An agent will typically request documents and other information by issuing an Information Document Request (Form 4564). Initial requests at the beginning of an examination are typically fairly broad with subsequent requests focusing on specific issues. Keep careful track of IDR requests and items produced. Always maintain a duplicate copy of any documents that are provided and include a transmittal letter with any response describing the documents produced.
If a taxpayer fails to produce requested items, the Service can summons a taxpayer or third party for books, records or testimony. Agents are directed to make an attempt to obtain information informally before issuing a summons. Agents are instructed to consider issuing a summons when a taxpayer fails to make requested records available within a reasonable period of time; where the records submitted are known or suspected to be incomplete and the examining agent believes that additional records containing relevant and material matter may be in the possession of the taxpayer or a third party; and when the examining agent is in doubt as to the availability of pertinent records and wishes to obtain oral testimony as to what records may exist and their location.
When an administrative summons is issued, the summoned person must personally appear at the time and place specified with any requested items. The summoned person has the right to counsel, the right to assert the attorney-client privilege, and the right to raise the self-incrimination privilege under the 5th Amendment. The IRS can issue administrative summonses to third parties believed to hold relevant information. Notice of summons issued to a third party must be given to the taxpayer within 3 days of the date on which service is made to the third party and no less than 23 days before the summons return date. This is to allow the taxpayer sufficient time to file a petition to quash.
If a summoned party ignores the summons or otherwise fails to fully comply, the Service may bring legal proceedings to enforce the summons in federal district court. A court will generally enforce a summons if there is a legitimate purpose for the examination; the information demanded may be relevant to that purpose; the information is not already in the possession of the Service; the information or document is not privileged and the Service has complied with the applicable administrative requirements of the Code and regulations.
Dealing with a Potential Criminal Referral
If an agent has a “firm indication of fraud” he or she is required to suspend the civil examination without disclosing the reason to the taxpayer. IRS regulations prohibit an agent from developing a criminal case against a taxpayer under the guise of a civil investigation. Then the agent must refer the case to the Criminal Investigation Division. The agent may be aware of potential fraud before he has enough evidence to suspend the exam and turn over the case. Take care to look for clues in the agent’s actions and behavior as to whether the nature of the case will shift to a criminal investigation. Among the tell-tale signs that a civil case may be heading toward a criminal referral is the sudden cessation of communication with you by the agent; the agent asks the client “state of mind” questions — usually starting with words like “why” and “didn’t you know?”; or the agent issues summons for otherwise closed tax periods, or summonses are issued for periods other than those contained in the original examination notice. Most importantly, look for the appearance of a “special agent”. A special agent is a federal law enforcement officer. He or she is required to identify himself as such and to give a Miranda-type warning. A special agent may arrive with the revenue agent or alone. Note that a special agent may make an unannounced visit to the taxpayer. The sole purpose of any such meeting is to catch the taxpayer off guard and without counsel, so that the client can incriminate himself. Because it is human nature to try to explain things, a taxpayer should be advised never to speak to a special agent without counsel present.
If an examination becomes a criminal investigation, or if you think that the examining agent is heading in that direction, consider the following: terminating all direct contact between the taxpayer and the IRS; obtaining taxpayer records from third parties and holding them; advising the taxpayer to refrain from witness tampering and document creation or alteration. Cooperation with the revenue agent will not save the day. If there is evidence of criminal conduct and that evidence is enough to obtain a conviction, there will be a referral, irrespective of how a taxpayer cooperates.
Dispositions of Audits — “Agreed” or “Unagreed”
Audits may be concluded with an “agreed case” or an “unagreed case.” Of course, if the taxpayer presents sufficient documentation for the items at issue, the examining agent may accept the return as it was filed. If the taxpayer and the examining agent reach an agreement on adjustments, the taxpayer and examining agent complete a form describing the adjustments to the return and agreeing that any additional tax may be assessed. Where the taxpayer and the examining agent cannot reach an agreement, the examining agent’s next step will depend upon whether there is sufficient time remaining on the statute of limitations on assessment3 (generally six months). If there is sufficient time left on the statute of limitations, the examining agent will prepare a report that will be reviewed by the examining agent’s manager. Once approved, the report is sent to the taxpayer along with a “30-day letter”. If there is not sufficient time left on the statute of limitations and the taxpayer will not agree to extend the statute, the report will be sent to the taxpayer with a statutory notice of deficiency (sometimes referred to as a “90-day letter”).
A 30-day letter gives the taxpayer an opportunity to protest the examining agent’s proposed adjustments to an administrative appeals officer. The taxpayer has 30 days within which to submit a written protest outlining the taxpayer’s position on fact and law. Appeals officers are charged with evaluating the case ex parte based upon the record created by the revenue agent and as supplemented by the taxpayer. The appeals officer can uphold the examining agent; find for the taxpayer or attempt to reach a settlement with the taxpayer. The appeals officer is instructed to consider the “hazards of litigation” for both sides in his or her evaluation of the case. If the case is agreed at this level, the parties will sign an agreement permitting the Service to assess and collect the agreed amounts. If the parties can not reach an agreement or if the taxpayer does not respond to the 30-day letter, the appeals officer will issue a statutory notice of deficiency.
The Service must issue a statutory notice of deficiency before it assesses additional tax. The Notice gives the taxpayer one last chance to contest the proposed deficiency prior to paying it. A taxpayer has 90 days to file a petition with the Tax Court to redetermine the deficiency. If the taxpayer does not respond to the 90-day letter, the Service will assess the proposed deficiency and will issue a bill to the taxpayer. At this point, the taxpayer must pay the amount assessed. The taxpayer then has the opportunity to contest the assessment by filing a refund claim. If the refund claim is disallowed, the taxpayer may then file a refund suit in United States District Court or United States Court of Claims.
Statutes of Limitations
The Service does not have an unlimited time to examine a tax return. As a general rule, the Service may not assess a tax more than 3 years after the later of the date the return was due or the date the return was actually filed. A special rule applies if the taxpayer omitted from his or her return an amount of gross income that is greater than 25% of the amount of gross income that was included on the return. In such cases, the statute of limitations for assessment is 6 years. In the case of a false or fraudulent return with intent to evade tax, the tax may be assessed at any time. When no return was filed, the tax may be assessed at any time.
In certain circumstances, a taxpayer may agree to extend the statute of limitations. This is done in writing on IRS Form 872 (Consent to Extend the Time to Assess Tax) or 872-A (Special Consent to Extend the Time to Assess Tax). A Form 872 extends the time to assess the tax to a specified date. A Form 872-A is a consent extending the period of limitations on assessment for an indefinite period of time. The consent given on Form 872-A can be revoked by filing a Form 872-T, which starts the running of the 90-day period for assessment of tax or issuance of a notice of deficiency. Another special type of consent is a “Restricted Consent” which can be used to extend the statutory period of assessment with respect to specific restricted issues. The statute of limitations is allowed to expire with respect to all other issues. Special statute of limitations rules also apply to tax returns on which a taxpayer failed to include any information required with respect to a “listed transaction” as defined by Code Section 6707A(c)(2). In such cases, the time for assessment does not expire before the date which is one year after the earlier of the date the information is furnished to the Service or the date a material advisor provides the identifying information to the Service.
The decision to extend the statute of limitations must be made carefully. Under certain circumstances, giving consent to extend the statute may benefit the taxpayer. For example, in an unagreed case, consent may be given so that the case can be considered by the appeals division. In other cases, extending a statute may simply provide the agent with additional time to identify and develop additional adjustments.
The IRS has broad authority to examine tax returns. An understanding of the rights and responsibilities of both taxpayers and the examining agent can help reduce the scope of a tax audit or examination and can lead to a more favorable disposition.

FBAR Regulations and Penalties, Wrong or Right?

by BH Metcalfe EA on 02/01/11

FBAR is a serious issue with the IRS. The fact that taxpayers have accounts over seas and there are some that do it to hide money from the IRS so they don’t have to pay taxes on the interest. I agree with the IRS that they do need to collect and that there needs to be a penalty. I also believe that there are innocent people that didn’t understand the rules.

For example, I have a client that had an account in Germany. He started  this account for a friend. His friend was a Chinese resident and because of this could not get an account in Germany. He need an account out of China to start a company in Europe. So my client started an account and let his friend use the account for his money. My client lives in the United States and never put any of his money or never used any of the money from the account.

When the IRS gave a grace period for reporting FBAR earnings, my client came forward, not even knowing if he owed any money. We reported the income and he didn’t owe any money. After we submitted these the IRS sent a letter back with him owing more than $150,000. The penalty was fifteen percent of the highest account balance for the year reported.  Other penalties on taxes usually are against the amount owed. The IRS concluded that he didn’t use or have possession of any of the money. We argued and argued and were able to get these penalties lifted.

I think these penalties should be advised and fixed to reflect those who are avoiding paying taxes. A lot like any IRS collection practice there are things that need to be fixed.

Great Move Againts the New Proposed Rules for 1099's

by BH Metcalfe EA on 02/01/11

My hat goes of to the NAEA(National association of Enrolled Agents). They took a proactive stance on letting Washington know what they are putting at risk in putting forth this legislation. The following is the letter from the President of the NAEA.

January 25, 2011

The Honorable Dave Camp
Committee on Ways and Means
U.S. House of Representatives
Washington, DC 20515
The Honorable Sander Levin
Ranking Member
Committee on Ways and Means
U.S. House of Representatives
Washington, DC 20515

Dear Chairman Camp and Ranking Member Levin,

As President of the National Association of Enrolled Agents, I write to you both on behalf of our nearly 12,000 members and on behalf of the 46,000 enrolled agents currently representing millions of taxpayers across the country. We ask that you take action on H.R. 4, the Small Business Paperwork Mandate Elimination Act of 2011, which would repeal Section 9006 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (P.L. 111-148) and relieve the extremely burdensome Form 1099 reporting requirements on small business taxpayers.

Section 9006 of (P.L. 111-148) places an unprecedented burden on small businesses by requiring them, beginning in 2012, to issue Forms 1099 to corporations for purchases of $600 or more for goods and services. These businesses will also be required to issue copies to the Internal Revenue Service. Small businesses will see substantially increased compliance costs to gather information, prepare and mail these additional Forms 1099. In addition to the increased cost for small businesses, the difficulties of IRS' implementation of the provision, receiving and reconciling these forms, will have significant costs and uncertain fiscal benefits. Instead of creating a barrier to growth, this onerous provision should be repealed to aid small business taxpayers in development and job creation.

While we support H.R. 4, we would be remiss if we didn't raise a related Form 1099 issue. The Small Business Jobs Act (P.L. 111-240) requires persons receiving rental income from real property to file information returns for payments of $600 or more during the year for rental property expenses. Enrolled agents provide tax advice to many Schedule E filers, and we foresee non-willful taxpayer compliance problems with the provision. The newness of the provision, effective January 1, 2011, and the annual January 31 submission date are problematic. We suggest either legislative or regulatory action be taken to address this compliance issue providing for a transition period. Given the recent changes to the filing of Form 1099 on taxpayers we suggest it is feasible to address both issues at the same time.

With 245 co-sponsors, Congressman Daniel Lungren has amply demonstrated bipartisan support for the Small Business Paperwork Mandate Elimination Act. We strongly support H.R. 4 and urge you to promptly take up the bill to prevent this arduous provision from harming small business taxpayers across the country.


Gina Jones, EA
President, National Association of Enrolled Agents

cc: The Honorable Douglas Shulman, Commissioner, Internal Revenue Service

My hat goes of to the NAEA(National association of Enrolled Agents). They took a proactive stance on letting Washington know what they are putting at risk in putting forth this legislation. The following is the letter from the President of the NAEA.